Dextrose gel for newborn low blood sugar

A sugar gel (40% dextrose) given to babies with low blood sugar. In the Sugar Babies trial in New Zealand, treatment failed less often with the gel than with a placebo gel. A follow-up at 9 to 10 years found no difference in school achievement but lower scores on one test of visual perception in the gel group.

Also called Oral dextrose gel · 40% dextrose gel

  • Intervention
  • In this atlas

Overview

Technical summary

Sugar Babies (Lancet 2013): treatment failure 14% against 24%, relative risk 0.57 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.98). Mid-childhood follow-up (Neonatology 2023): low educational achievement 42% against 45%; visual perception standard scores 95.2 against 100.6 and low visual perception scores 23% against 11% (relative risk 2.23, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.37). The authors concluded that dextrose gel does not appear to cause clinically significant differences in educational achievement or other neurodevelopmental outcomes. Both are single-population results for the contexts stated in the claims.

About this intervention

Type
Medicine
Mechanism
Not reported

Claims and evidence

Context At-risk babies of 35 to 42 weeks with low blood sugar (Sugar Babies trial)

Recipient
Newborn
Population
Babies of 35 to 42 weeks of gestation, younger than 48 hours old and at risk of hypoglycaemia. Of 514 enrolled babies, 242 (47%) became hypoglycaemic and were randomised; 237 were analysed.
Care setting
A tertiary centre in New Zealand.
Geography
New Zealand
Life stage
Newborns of 35 to 42 weeks of gestation, under 48 hours old. No gestational or postnatal bound is set in the structured fields because the abstract gives the ages as a range and in hours.
Gestational age
Not reported
Postnatal age
Not reported
Follow-up
Treatment failure was a blood glucose concentration under 2.6 mmol/L after two treatment attempts.
Eligibility: 3 inclusion criteria; exclusion criteria not stated
Included
  • Gestational age 35 to 42 weeks
  • Younger than 48 hours old
  • At risk of hypoglycaemia, and became hypoglycaemic
Excluded
None stated
  • Effect Interventional Certainty not assessed

    In the Sugar Babies trial in New Zealand, babies with low blood sugar who were given 40% dextrose gel (200 mg/kg) had treatment failure less often than babies given placebo gel: 14% (16 babies) against 24% (29 babies), relative risk 0.57 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.98; p=0.04). Treatment failure meant a blood glucose concentration under 2.6 mmol/L after two treatment attempts. The authors noted no serious adverse events.

    Applies to Newborn
    • Babies of 35 to 42 weeks of gestation, younger than 48 hours old and at risk of hypoglycaemia. Of 514 enrolled babies, 242 (47%) became hypoglycaemic and were randomised; 237 were analysed.
    • A tertiary centre in New Zealand.
    • New Zealand
    • Newborns of 35 to 42 weeks of gestation, under 48 hours old. No gestational or postnatal bound is set in the structured fields because the abstract gives the ages as a range and in hours.
    • Gestational age Not reported
    • Postnatal age Not reported
    Follow-up Treatment failure was a blood glucose concentration under 2.6 mmol/L after two treatment attempts.
    Certainty method
    Not assessed
    Limitations
    Single tertiary centre in New Zealand. Babies were of 35 to 42 weeks of gestation and under 48 hours old, and the comparison was with feeding alone plus placebo gel. Treatment failure is a short-term blood glucose outcome; later outcomes are in the mid-childhood follow-up claim. Only the abstract was read.
    Last checked
    Not recorded
    Next evidence check due
    Not scheduled
    Sources and citations (3)
    1. Supports Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      Publication · Lancet (London, England) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2013-12-21 · DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61645-1 · PMID: 24075361

      Locator
      Abstract, FINDINGS, sentences 3 and 4
      How it applies
      Treatment failure result and adverse events.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      d3194e08b3e533501948fc09092b8bd698ba412808141e6be91f24d3365131ed
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    2. Background Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      Publication · Lancet (London, England) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2013-12-21 · DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61645-1 · PMID: 24075361

      Locator
      Abstract, METHODS, sentences 1, 2 and 5
      How it applies
      Setting, population, doses and the definition of treatment failure.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      d3194e08b3e533501948fc09092b8bd698ba412808141e6be91f24d3365131ed
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    3. Background Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      Publication · Lancet (London, England) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2013-12-21 · DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61645-1 · PMID: 24075361

      Locator
      Abstract, FINDINGS, sentences 1 and 2
      How it applies
      Numbers enrolled, randomised and analysed.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      d3194e08b3e533501948fc09092b8bd698ba412808141e6be91f24d3365131ed
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.

Context Children aged 9 to 10 years who were treated as newborns in the Sugar Babies trial (mid-childhood follow-up)

Recipient
Newborn
Population
The recipient of the treatment was the newborn; the measured population is the same people as children at a mean age of 9.3 years: 184 of 227 eligible children (81%), who had been randomised as babies to dextrose gel or placebo gel.
Care setting
Not stated in the abstract.
Geography
Not stated in this abstract. The original trial ran in New Zealand.
Life stage
Mid-childhood, 9 to 10 years of age, after treatment as newborns
Gestational age
Not reported
Postnatal age
Not reported
Follow-up
One follow-up assessment at a mean age of 9.3 years. The primary outcome was low educational achievement in reading or mathematics.
Eligibility: 1 inclusion criterion; exclusion criteria not stated
Included
  • Children from the Sugar Babies trial cohort
Excluded
None stated
  • Safety Interventional Certainty not assessed

    At 9 to 10 years of age, children who had received dextrose gel as newborns did not differ from the placebo group in low educational achievement (42% against 45%; relative risk 1.04, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.44), but had lower visual perception standard scores (95.2 against 100.6; mean difference -5.68, 95% CI -9.79 to -1.57) and more low visual perception scores (23% against 11%; relative risk 2.23, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.37). Other secondary outcomes were similar. The authors concluded that dextrose gel does not appear to cause clinically significant differences in educational achievement or other neurodevelopmental outcomes.

    Applies to Newborn
    • The recipient of the treatment was the newborn; the measured population is the same people as children at a mean age of 9.3 years: 184 of 227 eligible children (81%), who had been randomised as babies to dextrose gel or placebo gel.
    • Not stated in the abstract.
    • Not stated in this abstract. The original trial ran in New Zealand.
    • Mid-childhood, 9 to 10 years of age, after treatment as newborns
    • Gestational age Not reported
    • Postnatal age Not reported
    Follow-up One follow-up assessment at a mean age of 9.3 years. The primary outcome was low educational achievement in reading or mathematics.
    Certainty method
    Not assessed
    Limitations
    Follow-up of a randomised trial with 184 of 227 eligible children (81%) assessed. The visual perception difference was a secondary outcome. The abstract does not say whether secondary results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Only the abstract was read.
    Last checked
    Not recorded
    Next evidence check due
    Not scheduled
    Sources and citations (3)
    1. Supports Mid-Childhood Outcomes after Dextrose Gel Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: Follow-Up of the Sugar Babies Randomized Trial

      Publication · Neonatology · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2022-12-14 · DOI: 10.1159/000527715 · PMID: 36516806 · PMCID: PMC9992292

      Locator
      Abstract, RESULTS, sentences 2 to 4
      How it applies
      Educational achievement and visual perception results.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      dceefa05b1c61bfdf1519053a4fdcfd0ec885d9c7e681446ed77f1360da7384d
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    2. Background Mid-Childhood Outcomes after Dextrose Gel Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: Follow-Up of the Sugar Babies Randomized Trial

      Publication · Neonatology · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2022-12-14 · DOI: 10.1159/000527715 · PMID: 36516806 · PMCID: PMC9992292

      Locator
      Abstract, METHODS and RESULTS sentence 1
      How it applies
      Age at follow-up, primary outcome and numbers assessed.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      dceefa05b1c61bfdf1519053a4fdcfd0ec885d9c7e681446ed77f1360da7384d
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    3. Background Mid-Childhood Outcomes after Dextrose Gel Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: Follow-Up of the Sugar Babies Randomized Trial

      Publication · Neonatology · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2022-12-14 · DOI: 10.1159/000527715 · PMID: 36516806 · PMCID: PMC9992292

      Locator
      Abstract, CONCLUSION, sentence 1
      How it applies
      The authors' conclusion.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      dceefa05b1c61bfdf1519053a4fdcfd0ec885d9c7e681446ed77f1360da7384d
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.

Clinical links

Each link reports what one cited claim says about one population. "Evaluated for" means studied, not shown to work. These links do not show that anything is effective or right for you.

Record details

Record id
maternal:oral-dextrose-gel
Content hash
ec58b35a02a7086d9471fa38747498919f7a34b042d2cf09c387ae94aebd9df7