Induction of labour

Induction means starting labour with medicines or other methods instead of waiting for it to begin on its own. It is usually done when the due date has passed or when a problem with the pregnancy puts the mother or baby at risk. Two large trials asked a different question: is it better to induce healthy women at a set time than to wait? ARRIVE looked at first-time mothers at 39 weeks. SWEPIS compared induction at 41 weeks with waiting until 42 weeks. They measured different things and found different results, so read each on its own page.

  • Intervention
  • In this atlas

Overview

Technical summary

A procedure with several methods: medicines (oxytocin, dinoprostone) and mechanical ripening of the cervix (a balloon device). Each method has its own record; this record is about the strategy of inducing labour at a chosen time. Sources: MedlinePlus Childbirth, NIH Labor and Delivery (cite only), ARRIVE (Grobman et al., NEJM 2018: abstract and registry record) and SWEPIS (Wennerholm et al., BMJ 2019: abstract and PMC full text, with its erratum). Neither trial compares methods of induction. The oxytocin record keeps induction apart from the use of oxytocin after birth to prevent bleeding.

About this intervention

Type
Procedure
Mechanism
Not reported

Claims and evidence

Context Fetuses and babies of low-risk first-time mothers randomised at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days: perinatal death or severe neonatal complications (ARRIVE)

Recipient
Mixed recipients
Population
Fetuses and newborns of low-risk nulliparous women who were randomly assigned at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation either to labour induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The composite counts fetal and newborn outcomes together: the registry says perinatal death includes antepartum stillbirth, intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death. The gestational bounds are the mother's gestational age at randomisation. Use this context only for the composite perinatal outcome.
Care setting
Multicentre trial in the United States; the abstract does not say what kind of site took part.
Geography
United States
Life stage
Antepartum pregnancy, birth and the newborn period to hospital discharge
Gestational age
38 weeks 0 days (266 days) to 38 weeks 6 days (272 days), measured at enrolment
Postnatal age
Not reported
Follow-up
Per the registry, the composite runs from delivery through 72 hours after birth, except perinatal death, which runs from the antepartum pregnancy period through hospital discharge.
Eligibility: 1 inclusion criterion; exclusion criteria not stated
Included
  • Fetuses of nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy randomised in ARRIVE, and the babies born of them
Excluded
None stated
  • Effect Interventional Certainty not assessed

    ARRIVE randomly assigned low-risk first-time mothers at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation either to labour induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The primary outcome, a composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications, occurred in 4.3% of neonates in the induction group and 5.4% in the expectant-management group (relative risk 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 1.00). The authors report that induction did not result in a significantly lower frequency of the composite adverse perinatal outcome.

    Applies to Mixed recipients
    • Fetuses and newborns of low-risk nulliparous women who were randomly assigned at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation either to labour induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The composite counts fetal and newborn outcomes together: the registry says perinatal death includes antepartum stillbirth, intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death. The gestational bounds are the mother's gestational age at randomisation. Use this context only for the composite perinatal outcome.
    • Multicentre trial in the United States; the abstract does not say what kind of site took part.
    • United States
    • Antepartum pregnancy, birth and the newborn period to hospital discharge
    • Gestational age 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days, measured at enrolment
    • Postnatal age Not reported
    Follow-up Per the registry, the composite runs from delivery through 72 hours after birth, except perinatal death, which runs from the antepartum pregnancy period through hospital discharge.
    Certainty method
    Not assessed
    Limitations
    The abstract and the registry record were read; the full text was not, because the PMC copy is not in the Open Access subset, so the analysis methods are not described here. The registry lists the composite's components: perinatal death, respiratory support within 72 hours after birth, an Apgar score of 3 or less at 5 minutes, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, meconium aspiration, birth trauma, intracranial or subgaleal haemorrhage, and hypotension needing vasopressor support. The registry lists masking as none. The percentages are as printed in the abstract, and the abstract does not give the number of neonates in each group, so none is computed. The result applies to low-risk first-time mothers offered induction at 39 weeks; it does not apply to induction for a medical reason or at other times. The registry shows the expectant-management arm continued until at least 40 weeks 5 days unless a medical indication arose.
    Last checked
    2026-10-14
    Next evidence check due
    Not scheduled
    Sources and citations (4)
    1. Supports Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

      Publication · The New England journal of medicine · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2018-08-09 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 · PMID: 30089070 · PMCID: PMC6186292

      Locator
      Abstract, METHODS: design, population, timing and primary outcome
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract; the full text was not retrieved.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      c79b91cfa406107c6a1429fe91e12fcf822498e6f6a48e8b77f0b06f4d8bb4ae
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    2. Supports Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

      Publication · The New England journal of medicine · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2018-08-09 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 · PMID: 30089070 · PMCID: PMC6186292

      Locator
      Abstract, RESULTS: primary outcome
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      c79b91cfa406107c6a1429fe91e12fcf822498e6f6a48e8b77f0b06f4d8bb4ae
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    3. Supports Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

      Publication · The New England journal of medicine · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2018-08-09 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 · PMID: 30089070 · PMCID: PMC6186292

      Locator
      Abstract, CONCLUSIONS, sentence 1: no significantly lower composite
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      c79b91cfa406107c6a1429fe91e12fcf822498e6f6a48e8b77f0b06f4d8bb4ae
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    4. Background A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management

      Registry · U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov) · Edition ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 JSON record, fetched on 2026-10-14; last update posted 2019-02-21. The record has posted results, which were not read. · NCT: NCT01990612

      Locator
      protocolSection.designModule.maskingInfo and outcomesModule.primaryOutcomes[0]
      How it applies
      Registry JSON: masking value and the primary outcome measure and time frame.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      2019-02-21
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      aad404d33fbefc6f8993abc098f036ef780d261dca87ef3e3e63bea4505ffe94
      Reuse basis
      Registry record. The raw API JSON is committed. The ClinicalTrials.gov terms page is rendered by JavaScript and its text was not read by a script, so the redistribution basis is unverified; any quotation stays short. The raw file is committed at research/snapshots/mg-ctgov-NCT01990612.json.

Context Fetuses and newborns of low-risk women randomised from 40+6 to 41+1 weeks: perinatal composite and perinatal death (SWEPIS)

Recipient
Mixed recipients
Population
Fetuses and the babies born of them, fetal and newborn together, because the trial counted stillbirth and neonatal outcomes in one composite and counted perinatal deaths (stillbirths and early neonatal deaths) together. The mother's gestational age at randomisation was 40+6 to 41+1 weeks (the paper spells the window out in weeks and days joined by a plus sign; no age bound is recorded in structured form because that spelling cannot be bound to a quote). Use this context only for the composite outcome and perinatal deaths.
Care setting
Fourteen hospitals in Sweden: five university clinics and nine county hospitals.
Geography
Sweden
Life stage
Late term and the perinatal period
Gestational age
Not reported
Postnatal age
Not reported
Follow-up
Randomisation to the perinatal period; the abstract does not give the follow-up time.
Eligibility: 1 inclusion criterion; exclusion criteria not stated
Included
  • Fetus of a woman with an uncomplicated, low-risk pregnancy with one baby who was randomised in SWEPIS, and the baby born of it
Excluded
None stated
  • Effect Interventional Certainty not assessed

    SWEPIS randomly assigned women with an uncomplicated, low-risk pregnancy of one baby, one to one, to induction of labour at 41 weeks or to expectant management with induction at 42 weeks. The composite perinatal outcome (stillbirth, neonatal death and a list of serious newborn problems) was found in 33 of 1381 pregnancies (2.4%) after induction and 31 of 1379 (2.2%) with expectant management. The relative risk was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.73; P=0.90), so the difference was not significant. After induction there were no perinatal deaths. With expectant management there were six, made up of five stillbirths and one death in the early neonatal period (P=0.03). The study was stopped early because deaths around birth were more frequent in the expectant management group (the monitoring board advised stopping on 2 October 2018; recruitment ended on 13 October 2018). The authors call the lower mortality a secondary outcome and ask for cautious interpretation.

    Source problem. A cited source is corrected. Check the sources before relying on this claim.

    Applies to Mixed recipients
    • Fetuses and the babies born of them, fetal and newborn together, because the trial counted stillbirth and neonatal outcomes in one composite and counted perinatal deaths (stillbirths and early neonatal deaths) together. The mother's gestational age at randomisation was 40+6 to 41+1 weeks (the paper spells the window out in weeks and days joined by a plus sign; no age bound is recorded in structured form because that spelling cannot be bound to a quote). Use this context only for the composite outcome and perinatal deaths.
    • Fourteen hospitals in Sweden: five university clinics and nine county hospitals.
    • Sweden
    • Late term and the perinatal period
    • Gestational age Not reported
    • Postnatal age Not reported
    Follow-up Randomisation to the perinatal period; the abstract does not give the follow-up time.
    Certainty method
    Not assessed
    Limitations
    Open-label, stopped early (the independent monitoring board advised stopping on 2 October 2018), so the mortality difference rests on a small number of deaths and an early stop; the authors say the results should be interpreted cautiously. Perinatal mortality was a secondary outcome. The expectant management group could still be induced at 42 weeks, so this compares timing, not induction against no induction. Only low-risk women were included. A published erratum corrects the neonatal intensive care admission figures in table 3; those figures are not used here, and the erratum does not change the numbers above. PubMed and the PMC full text were read. The ISRCTN registry record was not fetched.
    Last checked
    2026-10-14
    Next evidence check due
    Not scheduled
    Sources and citations (6)
    1. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. PubMed links a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; it corrects a neonatal intensive care admission row in table 3, which this atlas does not use. · Published 2019-11-20 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6131 · PMID: 31748223

      Locator
      Abstract, DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS: design and groups
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      bbeb7e6085a7f3cc6b2b3183bbd9988c9af403699da782a5d11c8435c58bc6a6
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    2. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. PubMed links a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; it corrects a neonatal intensive care admission row in table 3, which this atlas does not use. · Published 2019-11-20 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6131 · PMID: 31748223

      Locator
      Abstract, MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: composite
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      bbeb7e6085a7f3cc6b2b3183bbd9988c9af403699da782a5d11c8435c58bc6a6
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    3. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. PubMed links a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; it corrects a neonatal intensive care admission row in table 3, which this atlas does not use. · Published 2019-11-20 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6131 · PMID: 31748223

      Locator
      Abstract, RESULTS, sentences 1 to 3: early stop, composite and perinatal deaths
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      bbeb7e6085a7f3cc6b2b3183bbd9988c9af403699da782a5d11c8435c58bc6a6
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    4. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. PubMed links a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; it corrects a neonatal intensive care admission row in table 3, which this atlas does not use. · Published 2019-11-20 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6131 · PMID: 31748223

      Locator
      Abstract, CONCLUSIONS, sentences 2 and 3: secondary outcome and caution
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      bbeb7e6085a7f3cc6b2b3183bbd9988c9af403699da782a5d11c8435c58bc6a6
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    5. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · The BMJ · Edition PMC Open Access subset full-text XML of the SWEPIS paper (PMID 31748223), from NCBI E-utilities, fetched 2026-10-14. The version of record was not fetched. The paper has a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; this snapshot is marked corrected for that reason. · PMCID: PMC6939660

      Locator
      Results, para 1, sentence 1: the monitoring board's recommendation to stop
      How it applies
      PMC full text, CC BY-NC.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      a28804ac2098f66cc7ea3688f46df1aa8d895cc976e7467c4c06010c7eb7b252
      Reuse basis
      PMC Open Access subset article, but its licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) is not one this tool treats as redistributable (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC BY-ND). Only the hash of the bytes is kept. Short quotations under 25 words.
    6. Background Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · The BMJ · Edition PMC full-text XML of the BMJ erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689) for the SWEPIS paper, from NCBI E-utilities. · PMCID: PMC8684047 · PMID: 34911689 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n3072

      Locator
      Erratum text: neonatal intensive care admission row of table 3
      How it applies
      PMC erratum text, CC BY-NC; cited so that a reader knows the figure was corrected.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      1171935330fdb0c9371d083757728222cf9935849d80543cba60def0094c3879
      Reuse basis
      PMC Open Access subset article, but its licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) is not one this tool treats as redistributable (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC BY-ND). Only the hash of the bytes is kept. Short quotations under 25 words.

Context Low-risk first-time mothers randomised at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days: caesarean delivery (ARRIVE)

Recipient
Maternal
Population
Low-risk nulliparous women (no previous pregnancy beyond 20 weeks per the registry) with a singleton pregnancy who were randomly assigned at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation either to labour induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The gestational bounds are the gestational age at randomisation.
Care setting
Multicentre trial in the United States; the abstract does not say what kind of site took part.
Geography
United States
Life stage
Pregnancy from 38 weeks 0 days, to delivery
Gestational age
38 weeks 0 days (266 days) to 38 weeks 6 days (272 days), measured at enrolment
Postnatal age
Not reported
Follow-up
To delivery (caesarean delivery was the principal secondary outcome).
Eligibility: 1 inclusion criterion; 1 exclusion criterion
Included
  • Nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days
Excluded
  • Registry exclusions include a plan for induction before 40 weeks 5 days, a plan for caesarean delivery or a contraindication to labour, breech presentation, any diabetes mellitus, any hypertensive disorder, and other major maternal illness. The registry list is longer.
  • Effect Interventional Certainty not assessed

    In ARRIVE, caesarean delivery was the principal secondary outcome. It occurred in 18.6% of women in the induction group and 22.2% with expectant management (relative risk 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.93), a significantly lower frequency with induction. The women were low-risk first-time mothers randomly assigned at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation to induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management.

    Applies to Maternal
    • Low-risk nulliparous women (no previous pregnancy beyond 20 weeks per the registry) with a singleton pregnancy who were randomly assigned at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation either to labour induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The gestational bounds are the gestational age at randomisation.
    • Multicentre trial in the United States; the abstract does not say what kind of site took part.
    • United States
    • Pregnancy from 38 weeks 0 days, to delivery
    • Gestational age 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days, measured at enrolment
    • Postnatal age Not reported
    Follow-up To delivery (caesarean delivery was the principal secondary outcome).
    Certainty method
    Not assessed
    Limitations
    This is a secondary outcome. The abstract and registry were read, not the full text, so adjustment, missing data and other methods are not described here. The abstract gives no number of women in each group for this outcome, so none is computed. The result concerns low-risk first-time mothers and does not apply to other women. The primary composite outcome measured in babies is a separate claim in a separate context, and it did not differ significantly between the groups.
    Last checked
    2026-10-14
    Next evidence check due
    Not scheduled
    Sources and citations (3)
    1. Supports Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

      Publication · The New England journal of medicine · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2018-08-09 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 · PMID: 30089070 · PMCID: PMC6186292

      Locator
      Abstract, METHODS: population, timing and principal secondary outcome
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      c79b91cfa406107c6a1429fe91e12fcf822498e6f6a48e8b77f0b06f4d8bb4ae
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    2. Supports Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

      Publication · The New England journal of medicine · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2018-08-09 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 · PMID: 30089070 · PMCID: PMC6186292

      Locator
      Abstract, RESULTS: cesarean delivery
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      c79b91cfa406107c6a1429fe91e12fcf822498e6f6a48e8b77f0b06f4d8bb4ae
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    3. Supports Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

      Publication · The New England journal of medicine · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. The full text and the version of record were not fetched. · Published 2018-08-09 · DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 · PMID: 30089070 · PMCID: PMC6186292

      Locator
      Abstract, CONCLUSIONS, sentence 1: lower cesarean frequency
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Current
      Snapshot hash
      c79b91cfa406107c6a1429fe91e12fcf822498e6f6a48e8b77f0b06f4d8bb4ae
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.

Context Low-risk women with a singleton pregnancy randomised from 40+6 to 41+1 weeks: maternal outcomes (SWEPIS)

Recipient
Maternal
Population
Women with an uncomplicated, low-risk pregnancy of one baby, head down. They were assigned at random, one to one, through the Swedish Pregnancy Register, either to induction of labour at 41 weeks or to expectant management with induction at 42 weeks. Their gestational age at randomisation was 40+6 to 41+1 weeks (no structured age bound is recorded, as for the babies' context).
Care setting
Fourteen hospitals in Sweden: five university clinics and nine county hospitals.
Geography
Sweden
Life stage
Late term, from randomisation to delivery
Gestational age
Not reported
Postnatal age
Not reported
Follow-up
To delivery and maternal discharge; the abstract does not give the follow-up time.
Eligibility: 1 inclusion criterion; 1 exclusion criterion
Included
  • Singleton pregnancy, fetus in cephalic presentation, 40+6 to 41+1 weeks by ultrasound dating
Excluded
  • Women who had had a caesarean or other surgery on the uterus, women with diabetes before pregnancy or diabetes in pregnancy treated with insulin, women with a high blood pressure disorder of pregnancy, and women whose baby was small for its gestational age. The list in the paper is longer.
  • Effect Interventional Certainty not assessed

    In SWEPIS, the groups did not differ in how often women had a caesarean birth, an instrumental vaginal birth or any major maternal morbidity. One group was induced at 41 weeks and the other was managed expectantly and induced at 42 weeks. The study compared the two timings in 2760 women with an uncomplicated, low-risk pregnancy of one baby, and was stopped early.

    Source problem. A cited source is corrected. Check the sources before relying on this claim.

    Applies to Maternal
    • Women with an uncomplicated, low-risk pregnancy of one baby, head down. They were assigned at random, one to one, through the Swedish Pregnancy Register, either to induction of labour at 41 weeks or to expectant management with induction at 42 weeks. Their gestational age at randomisation was 40+6 to 41+1 weeks (no structured age bound is recorded, as for the babies' context).
    • Fourteen hospitals in Sweden: five university clinics and nine county hospitals.
    • Sweden
    • Late term, from randomisation to delivery
    • Gestational age Not reported
    • Postnatal age Not reported
    Follow-up To delivery and maternal discharge; the abstract does not give the follow-up time.
    Certainty method
    Not assessed
    Limitations
    The abstract gives no figures for these maternal outcomes, so none are stated. The study was open label and stopped early. The women were low-risk and the expectant group could be induced at 42 weeks. The perinatal results are a separate claim in a separate context. The SWEPIS paper has a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072) that corrects only the neonatal intensive care admission row of table 3; it does not touch these maternal outcomes.
    Last checked
    2026-10-14
    Next evidence check due
    Not scheduled
    Sources and citations (2)
    1. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. PubMed links a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; it corrects a neonatal intensive care admission row in table 3, which this atlas does not use. · Published 2019-11-20 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6131 · PMID: 31748223

      Locator
      Abstract, PARTICIPANTS and INTERVENTIONS
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      bbeb7e6085a7f3cc6b2b3183bbd9988c9af403699da782a5d11c8435c58bc6a6
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.
    2. Supports Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

      Publication · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · Edition PubMed record (abstract and bibliographic data) from NCBI E-utilities. PubMed links a published erratum (BMJ 2021;375:n3072, PMID 34911689), recorded as source maternal:pmc-pmc8684047; it corrects a neonatal intensive care admission row in table 3, which this atlas does not use. · Published 2019-11-20 · DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6131 · PMID: 31748223

      Locator
      Abstract, RESULTS, sentence 4: maternal outcomes
      How it applies
      PubMed abstract.
      Retrieved
      Source effective date
      Not reported
      Source state
      Corrected
      Snapshot hash
      bbeb7e6085a7f3cc6b2b3183bbd9988c9af403699da782a5d11c8435c58bc6a6
      Reuse basis
      PubMed record fetched through NCBI E-utilities. Only the hash of the bytes is kept, because publisher copyright may apply to the abstract (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disclaimer/). Short factual quotations under 25 words, with the citation.

Record details

Record id
maternal:induction-of-labour
Content hash
f9b0701917802e7f383ef236bae5ffe6770c3f0dacda2e4afb6a8c4d23cc9eed